Legal Opinion

Corlies & Corlies v. Holmes & Robinson

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1839PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Bronson, J.

The statute undoubtedly extends to all writs, whether original or judicial, and to every warrant or •summons, by which a man is called into court to answer in a civil action as a party ; and to executions against the body ; and it makes no difference whether the process be bailable or not. But) although suits may now be commenced by the filing and service *682of a declaration, 2 R. S. 347, § 1, 2,1 am unable to say that this case comes within the prohibition of the statute. A declaration has never been regarded in the law as “ civil process.” It is not a writ or command,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thayer v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. People ex rel. Lower v. DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API