Legal Opinion
Milan Express Co. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided January 23, 2014No. 13-1069PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO THE ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
J. DANIEL BREEN, Chief Judge.
On October 3, 2013, pursuant to an order of reference, Magistrate Judge Edward G. Bryant granted the Plaintiff, Milan Express Co., Inc.’s (“Milan”), motion to stop arbitration (D.E. 5) and denied Defendant, Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Ine.’s (“AUCRA”), motions to compel arbitration (D.E. 16) and to transfer venue (D.E. 17). (See Order, D.E. 42.) The magistrate judge found that although the contract governing this action contains an arbitration provision, the agreement to arbitrate is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Minnieland Private Day School, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Kakawi Yachting, Inc. v. Marlow Marine Sales, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
- Akecheta Morningstar v. Advanced Dental, PLLC and Garner Nichols Dental, PLLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025
- Akecheta Morningstar v. Advanced Dental, PLLC and Garner Nichols Dental, PLLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Applied Underwriters v. Milan Express Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2020