Furrowh v. Abacus Corp.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIE, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal from a decision of the Superior Court which affirmed the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Industrial Accident Board (the “Board”). The appellant, Bertha Rochelle Furrowh, sustained an on-the-job injury while she was employed as a part-time security guard by the appellee, Abacus Corporation (“Abacus”). A hearing was held before the Board to determine the appropriate compensation rate for Furrowh. Abacus contended that the correct way to calculate Furrowh’s weekly wages for compensation was to multiply her hourly rate of pay by the hours…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maver v. Dwelling Managers Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Howell v. Supermarkets General CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
- Frank M. Sheesley Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fitzgerald v. Roy's Flying" A"Superior Court of Delaware · 1970
- Stanton Lighting Corporation v. BernsteinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- Comegys v. Generations Home CareSuperior Court of Delaware · 2005
- Lorri Bosse v. Sargent CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025