Legal Opinion

Claim of Lankford v. Progno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 1980Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeals from decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 20, 1978 and March 13, 1979. Claimant was employed as an assistant race horse trainer at the Finger Lakes Race Track. In caring for the horses, he applied the drugs Phenylbutazone (Bute) and Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) to the horses’ extremities. On several occasions he ingested Bute tablets. Prior to his employment he had been in good health and had no history of blood disease. The board found on the entire record that claimant was exposed to Bute and DMSO in his employment and such exposure caused him to contract bone…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Sanderson v. CurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Claim of De Maio v. Rockford Plumbing & HeatingNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API