Legal Opinion
DeJesus v. New York City Housing Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2008PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. In this slip and fall case, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact that defendant caused or created, or had constructive notice of a dangerous recurring condition.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Pfeuffer v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Halpern v. Costco Warehouse/ Costco WholesaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Willis v. Galileo Cortlandt, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Raposo v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Hartley v. Burnside Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.