Legal Opinion

MEDFORD INSURANCE COMPANY v. Weimer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1964No. 16429PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

Appellee B. L. Weimer sued Medford Insurance Company, Ltd. to recover under an insurance policy for fire damage to his' truck. Appellant contended that it had cancelled the policy prior to the loss. The jury found in response to special issues that (1) Weimer did not receive, and (2) appellant did not mail to Weimer, a notice of cancellation. The amount of loss having been stipulated, judgment was rendered in favor of Weimer for that amount. 1

By its first two points of error on appeal appellant asserts that, since it established without dispute that notice of cancellation had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Duff v. Secured Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Texas Cas. Ins. Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laxton v. National Grange Mutual Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Willis v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Commonwealth County Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Sudduth v. Commonwealth County Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API