Legal Opinion
At & T Universal Card Services Corp. v. Feld (In Re Feld)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 18, 1996No. 19-10616PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIANE WEISS SIGMUND, Bankruptcy Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff in the instant adversary proceeding, AT & T Universal Card Services, Corp. (“AT & T”), seeks to have a credit card debt declared nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), the fraud exception. At issue is a debt in the amount of $8,195.48 resulting primarily from cash advances taken by the debtor Amy Feld (“Debtor”) on plaintiffs credit card. We find that the debt is dischargeable.
As recently articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Field v. Mans, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 437, 133 L.Ed.2d 351 (1995), the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Carolin Corporation v. Robert J. Miller, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Amjad I. Eashai, Debtor. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Amjad I. EashaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- In Re Benethel Rembert, Debtor. Benethel Rembert v. At & T Universal Card Services, Inc. Citibank South Dakota, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- At&T Universal Card Services v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- At & T Universal Card Services v. Ellingsworth (In Re Ellingsworth)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
- Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. Ritter (In Re Ritter)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- FDS National Bank v. Alam (In Re Alam)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.