Legal Opinion

Pryatel v. K.P.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2004No. 20040049PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] K.P. is appealing from a Southeast Judicial District Court order denying change of venue and from an order terminating alternative treatment and ordering K.P. to be hospitalized in the North Dakota State Hospital at Jamestown, North Dakota, until March 20, 2004, or until further court order. K.P. argues the district court abused its discretion in denying her motion for a change of venue. K.P. also argues the district court erred in determining she was not complying with a court order for less restrictive treatment and in determining this alternative treatment was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Interest of GustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tibert v. City of MintoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. All New Gutter Service, Inc. v. DusekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re KPNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API