Legal Opinion

C.G.O. v. R.A.O.

Delaware Family Court

Decided April 9, 2002No. CN00-10822Published

1Opinion of the Court

UPON A MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR CUSTODY

WASERSTEIN, J.

Before the Court are a Motion to Dismiss filed by R.A.O. (hereinafter “Mother”) and the Response thereto. At issue is whether this Court should dismiss the Petition for Custody filed by C.G.O. (hereinafter “Father”), regarding the parties’ son, C.W.O. (d.o.b. 1/1/97), due to a lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Uniform Child *940Custody Jurisdiction Act (hereinafter “UC-CJA”) codified at 13 Del. C., § 1901 et seq. On January 7, 2002, a hearing was held in order to determine whether Delaware has jurisdiction over this case. In accordance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. VetterSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. Yost v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Bruno v. Western Pacific RailroadCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API