Legal Opinion

Trear v. Chamberlain

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 24, 2018No. 115819Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 115,819 KEVIN W. TREAR, Appellant/Cross-appellee, v. SUSAN J. CHAMBERLAIN, NATHAN GOODELL, and JAMIE JASNOSKI, Appellees/Cross-appellants. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The interpretation and legal effect of written instruments are matters of law over which appellate courts exercise unlimited review. 2. The primary rule for interpreting written contracts is to ascertain the parties' intent. If the contract terms are clear, the parties' intent is to be determined from the contract language without applying rules of construction. If, on the other hand,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Uno Restaurants, Inc. v. Boston Kenmore Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Waste Connections of Kansas, Inc. v. Ritchie Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Bellamy v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. John R. Miller v. Lesea Broadcasting, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Bonanza, Inc. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API