Legal Opinion
Mastec North America, Inc. v. Holton
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided June 7, 2002No. 2010103PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PITTMAN, Judge.
In June 2000, Curtis Dale Holton (“the employee”) sued Mastec North America, Inc. (“the employer”), for workers’ compensation benefits. The employee alleged that he was injured in the line and scope of his employment and that he had suffered a permanent total disability. Following a bench trial, the trial court found that the employee was injured in the line and scope of his employment and that the employee has a permanent total disability. The employer filed a postjudgment motion, which the trial court granted as to the calculation of the benefits owed the employee. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dunlop Tire & Rubber Co. v. PettusCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- WIREGRASS COMP. MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC INC. v. PriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Gold Kist, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Kewish v. Alabama Home Builders Self Insurers FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- LFI Pierce, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ex Parte HoltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Pollock v. Girl Scouts of Southern Alabama, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
- Mastec North America, Inc. v. HoltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003