Legal Opinion
Chaparral Steel Company v. The United States, and Norsk Jernverk A.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 29, 1990No. 89-1338, 88-1339Published
1Opinion of the Court
901 F.2d 1097
12 ITRD 1154
CHAPARRAL STEEL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Norsk Jernverk A.S., Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 89-1338, 88-1339.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
April 17, 1990.
Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined May 29, 1990.
Stephen McLaughlin, U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n, Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellant, The U.S.
Arnold Podgorsky, Gerst, Heffner, Carpenter & Podgorsky, Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellant, Norsk Jernverk A.S. With him on the brief were Mary Todd Carpenter and Carrie L. Bumgarner.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.