Legal Opinion

Abdullah v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 1999No. 98-4558PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to suppress the bag of cannabis, which he threw into a tree as he fled the police, under the theory of abandonment. See California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991); Perez v. State, 620 So.2d 1256 (Fla.1993); State v. Bartee, 623 So.2d 458 (Fla.1993). Although appellant may have been illegally stopped and thereafter seized as a result of his initial submission to police authority, the seizure was terminated once he ran from the police. Therefore, the bag he threw while fleeing was not discarded at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Hollinger v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. State v. BarteeSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huffman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. State v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API