Legal Opinion

Ambrose v. Rayne

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 21, 1982No. 81-1759PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JORGENSON, Judge.

Marcus Ambrose, the personal representative of the estate of M. Fred Rayne, appeals from the trial court’s order which denied partition and granted the respondent, appellee here, continued use of the marital domicile, holding that Paragraph 3 of the original final judgment of dissolution entered in 1972 was “not subject to modification.” 1 We reverse.

An award of exclusive use of property must be determined by the equity of the cause and should be for a specified period. It is always subject to modification whenever there is a change of circumstances. Duncan v. Duncan, 379…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Weinstein v. WeinsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Di Martino v. Di MartinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Schneider v. SchneiderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cone v. ConeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Wigginton v. WiggintonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API