Legal Opinion
Highway Const. Co. v. McClelland
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1926No. 7179PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEB CUBIAM.
Defendant in error has filed a petition for rehearing; plaintiff in error has filed “suggestions” in support of the same. Both parties unite in the contention that the court below had jurisdiction to try the cause.
From the whole record, including the petition for rehearing and the “suggestions” in support of the same, we gather the following facts: The ease was originally commenced in the state court, but removed to the federal court. The petition for removal was based on diverse citizenship: (1) As between plaintiff and defendant Highway Construction Company, a separable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Torrence v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Texas Transportation Co. v. SeeligsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Jones v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1916
- Youtsey v. HoffmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1901
- Fischer v. Star Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boelens v. Redman Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Anastasia Wullschleger v. Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Stanhope v. Ford Motor Credit Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1980
- Miller v. DavisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.