Legal Opinion

In re Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1911No. Crim. No. 231Published

PETITION for writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The writ must be denied for various reasons. First, the evidence had upon the preliminary examination is not authenticated in any manner. Second, while the aggressive acts of defendant were directed toward a third party, they were done in the presence of the officer and so terrorized him that he was prevented from discharging a duty and the effect of which was to resist such officer. As to the other offense of assault with a deadly weapon, it may be, if the case of People v. Sylva, 143 Cal. 62, [78 Pac. 814], is to be followed as a correct exposition of the law, that upon a final…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SylvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Fry v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API