Legal Opinion
Edward Bolam v. Mobil Oil Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 26, 1990No. 89-3033PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants, a group of Mobil service station dealers (“Dealers”), contend that Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”) had a legal obligation to bill them for the temperature compensated volume of gasoline as opposed to billing for the actual volume delivered. Mobil opposed this claim on the grounds that Florida law does not require temperature compensated invoicing. The district court granted summary judgment to Mobil on the question of whether Florida law required Mobil to bill Dealers for temperature compensated gasoline.
Prior to January 1, 1987, Mobil provided gasoline to Dealers, billing for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gulf Life Insurance Company, a Florida Corporation v. Carl J. Arnold, an Individual Residing in the State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Pan Am. World Airways, Inc. v. FLA. PUB. SERV. COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Terrinoni v. WESTWARD HO!District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hopkins v. BP Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Legal Environmental Assistance Foundation, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Brevard County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Robinson v. Terry (MAG+)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025