Legal Opinion

James Roseborough, Jr. v. The People of the State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1963No. 18369_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

James Roseborough, Jr., in custody pursuant to a judgment of a court of the State of California, appeals from an order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

An application for a writ of habeas corpus is the assertion of a right against the person having the applicant in custody. Roseborough is in the custody of E. J. Oberhauser, Superintendent of the California Institution for Men, Chino, California. This official, however, was not named or served as a party in this proceeding, the sole respondent being The People of the State of California.

It follows that,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robert H. Bohm v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Homer K. Morehead v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Manuel Lee Matysek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. Osborn v. Commonwealth, Court of Common PleasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. United States ex rel. Lyle v. CarneyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Johnson v. FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API