Ordenstein v. Bones
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
The statute (Comp. Laws, 2257) authorizes the issuing of an attachment writ where plaintiff sues to recover “an indebtedness upon a contract, expressed or implied, for the direct payment of money, and that such contract was made or is payable in this territory.” Plaintiff in this case was a merchant doing business in California, and sold goods to defendants, who were living in this territory. It is admitted that such sale of goods was made in California, and that such contract would not support an attachment writ. After the sale was made, however, defendants, when, pressed for payment, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- White v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Eck v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Dulton v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Gooding v. HingstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by1 opinion
- Valley National Bank v. Educational Credit Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975