People v. Etter
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Cass. (O’Hara, J.) Respondents were convicted of larceny, and on certiorari to tbe circuit court tbe judgment of tbe justice was affirmed. Tbe facts are stated in tbe. opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Defendants were tried and convicted before a jury in justice’s court of the crime of larceny, and each sentenced to paya fine of §50, and to be each, imprisoned in the county jail 60 days.
Defendants sued out a writ of certiorari from the circuit court upon the errors alleged, as follows: '
1. Because the suit against them was not conducted by the prosecuting attorney of the county, and no authority was shown by the attorney who appeared for the people' to prosecute the same.
2. Because the officer who arrested defendants was a witness, and testified against defendants upon the trial, and such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. HobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Galloway v. CorbittMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Alt v. LaloneMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- Born v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
- State v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Henika v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Born v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
- People v. GrimmMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.