Legal Opinion
Kemp v. State Board of Agriculture
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 23, 1990No. 88CA0347, 88CA0899PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
Plaintiff, Sandra R. Kemp, appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing her claims for damages brought against defendants, Colorado State Board of Agriculture, Colorado State University, Phillip Austin, Dana Hiatt, and Roselyn Keller. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
While employed by the university as an extension agent, plaintiff filed a formal grievance with the university accusing her supervisor and certain other employees of improper racial and sexual discrimination.
Under policies established by the university’s Grievance Procedure for the Resolution of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Talco, Ltd. v. DanielsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Kemp v. State Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Little v. FellmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Kemp v. State Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Robin Joy Shahar v. Michael J. Bowers, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.