Legal Opinion

People v. Calise

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided February 23, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ruth Levine Sussman, J.

The defendant, Christopher Calise, is charged with aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle (Vehicle and *278Traffic Law § 511 [2] [a] [iv]). He moves for preclusion of statements based on the People’s failure to provide notice pursuant to CPL 710.30. The People oppose the motion on the ground that although formal CPL 710.30 notice was not given, the defendant had actual notice of the statements which were contained in the text of the accusatory instrument.

The statements in question were contained within the factual allegations of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. O'DohertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. MichelNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. CostelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HellerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  2. People v. SmithNassau County District Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API