Legal Opinion
Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Texon, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 16, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 57-526PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
Defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that there is no infringement of any claim of Novak patent No. 2,525,310 in suit.
The patent claims a very specific method for the production of a cellulose fibre web sheet material impregnated with a thermosetting resin, “primarily” for laminating purposes.
The accused process is for making not a laminate but a battery separator by impregnating or saturating a cellulosic web while wet with a water-soluble phenolformaldehyde resin. After being saturated with resin, the web is passed through a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Allen-Bradley Co. v. Erie Resistor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Texon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Texon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959