Umans v. Tomfar Transportation, Inc.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Glover, J.), entered March 7, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict, and upon an order of the same court (Milano, J.), dated May 29, 2001, denying that branch of her motion which was to strike the defendants’ answer, is in favor of the defendants and against her.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that the defendants’ conduct during disclosure did *406not constitute willful or contumacious…