Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 27, 1993No. 92-00440PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLUE, Judge.

James L. Smith (husband) appeals the final judgment after remand for redetermi-nation of his ability to pay alimony. He raises three issues, only one of which has merit. The husband correctly argues the trial court erred in relying upon the prior record to determine his ability to pay alimony and in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing.

The parties’ divorce action was tried before Judge Knowles who entered a final judgment in October 1989. Josie H. Smith (wife) appealed, arguing the judge had not properly evaluated the husband’s ability to pay alimony. On January 25, 1991, this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reaves v. REAVES, JR.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Smith v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fry v. FryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Harris v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. K.B. v. Department of Children & Family Services & Guardian Ad Litem ProgramDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Roberts v. RobertsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API