Legal Opinion

Slifka v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 22, 1950No. 21514_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The only question upon these appeals is whether the partnerships formed by the taxpayers in 1943 were within the statutory definition of that word. 1 The Supreme Court has recently three times dealt with similar situations, 2 and from these deci sions we understand that they present instances of the more general test laid down in Gregory v. Helvering : 3 i. e., whether an association, or joint venture, which satisfies all formal requirements and may be valid as between the parties, has been created to promote the conduct of their business in any other way than by reducing taxes. That this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Lusthaus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Robert M. Diggs and Clara C. Diggs v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Joe Lynch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Hanson v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
  4. Dyer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  5. Lannan v. KelmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API