Kerlinske v. Etzel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
Appellant contends that the plaintiff is guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law in failing to give warning of his intention to pass the defendant’s car. In Suren v. Zuege, 186 Wis. 264, 201 N. W. 722, we held that a motorcycle officer was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law under quite similar circumstances. The only difference between the two cases is that in the Suren Case the motorcycle officer was proceeding at a higher rate of speed than was the plaintiff in this case. In this case the driveway into which defendant turned her car was less frequently used…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Suren v. ZuegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- France v. BenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Kleckner v. Great American Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Zurfluh v. Lewis CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Fink v. LewarkWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- France v. BenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964