Legal Opinion

Essex Bowling Co. v. Argyle Realty Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 16, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

In these three actions of tort for the conversion of fourteen bowling alleys1 the plaintiff’s exceptions are to the direction of verdicts for the defendants and to the exclusion of evidence. The alleys occupied an entire one-story building at 48 Essex Street, Lawrence. The building was built in 1916, and the alleys were installed as early as 1917. In 1906 the real estate had been acquired by Charles E. Bradley and William J. Bradley from a corporation known as the Essex Company (which was in no way related to the plaintiff corporation), and the Bradleys gave back a mortgage to the Essex…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mills v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. New England Box Co. v. C & R Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Lawyers Mortgage Investment Corp. v. Paramount Laundries Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Jackson v. InnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Stone v. LivingstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cherry Bowl, Inc. v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Kolligian v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API