Legal Opinion
Dunkin v. Barkus & Kronstadt, D.O.'s P.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 1, 1988No. 88-1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal1 from an order enjoining the appellant from an alleged violation of a non-competitive agreement. We conclude that the trial court erroneously deter-' mined that the conduct in question violated the contract between the parties and therefore reverse the order under review.
In 1985, Dr. Dunkin, an osteopathic physician specializing in obstetrics and gynecology, was employed by the defendant Barkus & Kronstadt, D.O.’s, P.A., which was also engaged in that practice. His employment agreement provided in part as follows:
14. Restrictive Covenant. As of the date…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Storz Broadcasting Co. v. CourtneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Dick v. GeistIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Haldeman v. SimontonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Oates v. LeonardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Bolen International, Inc. v. MedowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frumkes v. Beasley-Reed Broadcasting of Miami, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Marx v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Dunkin v. BARKUS & KRONSTADT, DO'S, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Preferred Care Partners Holding Corp. v. Mercyhealth, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006