Legal Opinion

State v. Suazo

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1993No. 12771Published

1Opinion of the Court

877 P.2d 1097 (1993)

117 N.M. 793

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Abel G. SUAZO, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12771.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

March 17, 1993.

Tom Udall, Atty. Gen., Bruce J. Fort, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellant.

Carlos F. Vigil, Santa Fe, for defendant-appellee.

OPINION

CHAVEZ, Judge.

The state appeals the district court's reversal of the revocation of appellee Abel Suazo's driver's license. Two issues are raised on appeal. First, the state contends Suazo refused to take a chemical breath test as required by NMSA 1978, Section 66-8-107…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Asbridge v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lund v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Robertson v. State Ex Rel. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Zidell v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Standish v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API