Legal Opinion
Met-Wood Products Corp. v. Sparks-Withington Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 9, 1947No. Civil Action No. 6766PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, District Judge.
The defendant moves for an order quashing the writ of garnishment on two grounds:
The first is that there was no ground for the .affiant stating in the .prescribed affidavit for the writ of garnishment that he had just apprehension of loss in the absence of a writ of garnishment, and that the proceedings were, therefore, unwarranted and an abuse of the process of the Court. The second is that the affidavit for the writ of garnishment is fatally defective. It is necessary only to deal with the second ground.
The garnishment procedure in this case is governed by the statutes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. Sutherlin-Meade Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908
- Weber v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- North Penn Iron Co. v. BoyceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Chapman v. Detroit Metropolitan Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clarence Austin v. Otis SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Robert W. Irwin Co. v. Sterling, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1953
- Clarence Austin v. Otis SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962