Legal Opinion

Harbine Bank v. McCune

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1936No. 29622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

A married woman signed a promissory note containing the married woman’s clause, but denied that the bank extended any credit on her separate estate, and claimed that she had no property, and that the note was given for an indebtedness of her husband. Jury waived; trial had to court and judgment entered against her for $2,293.56, from which she appeals.

The plaintiff brought suit May 1, 1934, against Caroline McCune and her husband upon a promissory note given plaintiff bank by the defendants on November 17, 1930, for $1,775, which note contained a married woman’s clause, pledging payment of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grand Island Banking Co. v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Kocher v. CornellNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Davis v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Biltwell Tire & Battery Co. v. BookNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Sturm v. LloydNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Riggs v. HrochNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Ehlers v. SeipNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API