Legal Opinion

Frisard v. Oalmann

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1965No. 1843PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McBRIDE, Judge.

This case involves a suit for damages sustained by an automobile in a collision with another car in the intersection of Dauphine and Reynes Streets on the afternoon of March 31, 1964; each street is narrow, measuring about 20 feet wide, and of equal dignity; the intersection is uncontrolled by semaphore light signals, signs or other traffic devices. One of the specifications of negligence is that Oalmann (hereinafter called defendant) failed to yield the right-of-way to plaintiff’s vehicle, which was driven by plaintiff’s son; the defense is that young Frisard was guilty of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Smith v. BorchersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  3. McCandless v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  4. Theunissen v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  5. D & D PLANTING CO. v. Employers Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arceneaux v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Messana v. Allstate Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Arceneaux v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Hatfield v. BernosLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Deamer v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API