Legal Opinion
Kate Koeller, et al. v. Nixplay, Inc., et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 8, 2026No. 5:25-cv-04549Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 KATE KOELLER, et al., Case No. 25-cv-04549-VKD 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 10 v. REMAND 11 NIXPLAY, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendants. 12 13 14 On May 29, 2025, defendants Nixplay, Inc. and Creedon Technologies USA, LLC 15 removed this action from the Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara, invoking the Court’s 16 diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Dkt. No. 1. On July 28, 2025, plaintiffs Kate 17 Koeller, Jeff Koeller, Matt Davidson, and Amy Boleski filed a first…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, Lp, Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.