Legal Opinion
Porte v. Polachek
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided April 4, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSulzberger, J.
The plaintiff in each of the above actions moves for an order striking out the answer of the defendant in each case and for summary judgment. Heretofore similar motions were made, which previous motions were denied by the Appellate Term, but which granted leave to renew the said motions without prejudice, and, by reason of the denial with the right to renew without prejudice, these motions are now before this court.
*892In each action the plaintiff sues on a bond for $1,000 executed by the defendant in the State of Illinois which bonds were part of an issue of $115,000 secured by a mortgage on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Stumpf v. HallahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Cunningham v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Stumpf v. . HallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Greene v. New York United Hotels, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Greenbriar North Section II, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Goodman v. NadlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Franklin Society for Home Building & Savings v. WesemanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- Harris v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Mercury Realty Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.