Commonwealth v. Linhares
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanlon, J.
After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of cruelty to animals for an incident in which he struck and killed a duck with his car in a mall parking lot. The trial judge allowed the defendant’s posttrial motion for a required finding of *820not guilty, pursuant to Mass.R.Crim.P. 25(b)(2), as amended, 420 Mass. 1502 (1995).
More than thirty days later, the Commonwealth moved to file a late notice of appeal, which motion was granted, and now argues that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, was sufficient to sustain the conviction. We agree and reverse.1
1. Facts.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Commonwealth v. ArmstrongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. TorresMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. MagoonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DalyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. KardasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. SzewczykMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- COMMONWEALTH v. DAVID J. CORDEIRO, JR.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2023