Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Mobley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1944No. 14875PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is obvious that any right to any of the relief prayed for is dependent upon the deed dated October 26, 1943, and signed by the petitioner. If that deed is valid, then the petition shows that the petitioner has no intérest in or title to the land in controversy, and, hence, is entitled to no relief relating thereto. The deed is properly executed, recites a consideration, and is valid on its face. To show its invalidity, the petition sets forth what it is contended constitutes duress as a result of which the deed was executed. “Duress…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Graham v. Marks & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Candler v. ByfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Mallory v. Royston BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Bond v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Frost v. FrostSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY IN MACON v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Budget Charge Accounts, Inc. v. PetersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  5. Duncan v. BallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API