Legal Opinion
Burnside v. Lamanna
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 30, 2001No. 01-3580PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
John Otis Burnside, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals from a district court judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules *440of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
In 1989, a Florida federal jury found Burnside guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and attempt to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, as well as using a firearm during the commission of a drug…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Illinois Conference of Teamsters and Employers Welfare Fund v. Steve Gilbert TruckingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Hardison v. DunbarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1966
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burnside v. HogstenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007