Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Miami Exporting Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This cause was adjourned from the Supreme Court of Hamilton county. It was a bill in chancery, under section 59 of the statute regulating proceedings in chancery, to charge debts due from the other defendants to the Miami Exporting Company, with the payment of a judgment obtained by the complainants against the company.

Read the full summary

This cause was adjourned from the Supreme Court of Hamilton county. It was a bill in chancery, under section 59 of the statute regulating proceedings in chancery, to charge debts due from the other defendants to the Miami Exporting Company, with the payment of a judgment obtained by the complainants against the company. Upon one judgment no execution had been sued out; upon the other, execution had issued, was returned nulla bona, and levied upon real estate, which, upon a vendí, had been sold for a very small sum. No new ft. fa. had been taken. The bill did not charge that execution had been…

1Opinion of the Court

*The Court overruled the demurrer.

Judge Burnet

being a stockholder in the Miami Bank did not sit in the cause. Judge Sherman dissented. A majority of the judges not uniting in the opinion, no reasons were given.†

Note by the Editor. — That execution need not issue before creditor’s bill will be entertained, see also vi. 227.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bomberger v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Palumbo v. Indust. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API