Legal Opinion

Neilson v. Lagow

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 18, 1851PublishedCited by 30 opinions

This case was brought up from the Supreme Court of Indiana, by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act. It originally stood in the name of Wilson Lagow, the ancestor of the present defendants in error. The point involved was the construction of the act of Congress, passed on the 1st May, 1820, (3 Stat. at Large, 568,) which forbids land from being-purchased on account of the United States except under a law authorizing such purchase.

Read the full summary

This case was brought up from the Supreme Court of Indiana, by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act. It originally stood in the name of Wilson Lagow, the ancestor of the present defendants in error. The point involved was the construction of the act of Congress, passed on the 1st May, 1820, (3 Stat. at Large, 568,) which forbids land from being-purchased on account of the United States except under a law authorizing such purchase. At a preceding term of this court a motion was maeje to dismiss the case for want- of jurisdiction, which is reported in 7 How. 772. A…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Curtis

This case comes here by a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. The record shows that Lagow, the defendant in error, instituted an action of disseisin in a Circuit Court of the State of Indiana, whereby he sought to recover of Neilson, the plaintiff' in error, a tract of land described in the counts. The tenant having pleaded the general issue, the case was committed to a jury. At the trial, it appeared that Lagow, together with Nathaniel Ewing, John D. Hay, and Caroline Smith, whose title, if any, Lagow is alleged to have afterwards acquired, were in possession of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hughes v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Dugan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  3. The United States, in Error v. Phineas Bradley, Surviving Administrator of David Ott DeceasedSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  4. United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  5. ARMSTRONG v. the Treasurer of Athens CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1842

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Williams v. KaiserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Van Brocklin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Helvering v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Radio Station Wow, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. New York Ex Rel. Bryant v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API