Legal Opinion

Sue v. Homer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

The only objection raised by the defendants-appellants to the order of reference in this case is that it deprives the defendants of the right to jury trial. The defendants state in their brief that “in the absence of such right, our argument becomes valueless, since our quarrel is not as to Court or Referee, but Court with or Court without Jury.” The right to jury trial was waived by the defendants by the joinder in their answer of equitable counterclaims with their counterclaim at law for damages for fraud (Di Menna v. Cooper & Evans Co., 220 N. Y. 391; Liberty Bank of Buffalo v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Di Menna v. . Cooper Evans Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Liberty Bank of Buffalo v. LansingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crossroads Apartments Associates v. LeBooRochester City Court · 1991
  2. International Playtex, Inc. v. CIS Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. John W. Cowper Co. v. Buffalo Hotel Development VentureNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API