Houston City Street Railway Co. v. Autrey

PLEASANTS, Associate Justice.

The appellant assigns several errors, but we refrain from noticing any of them, save the three following:

“ 8. The verdict of the jury is contrary to and is not supported by the evidence, and is against the great preponderance of the evidence, in this, that there was no evidence showing that the nail which penetrated the foot of plaintiff’s horse was placed on the track or street by the defendant, or that the said nail was in any plank on defendant’s track, or in any plank belonging to defendant, or in any way connected with defendant’s road or track.

“9. The…