Legal Opinion
Whitlock v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 15, 1984No. 84-264PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
458 So.2d 888 (1984)
William F. WHITLOCK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-264.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
November 15, 1984.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lucinda H. Young, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kenneth McLaughlin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
2Per curiam
Whitlock appeals from his sentence on the grounds that there are no clear and convincing reasons for the trial court's departure, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), and that the trial court's departure from the recommended sentence…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Carney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Hendrix v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985