Greater Houston Bank v. Conte
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRAUGHN, Justice.
Relators, Greater Houston Bank, et al (the bank), seek a writ of prohibition to prevent Respondents, Joseph P. Conte, et al (Conte), from relitigating certain issues which the Bank contends were res judicata because they were, or should have been raised, in an earlier action between the two parties. Conte, conversely, argues that said issues were not mature at the time of the earlier action. We hold that the issues which were, or should have been, raised in the earlier suit are barred from relitigation; and that certain of the issues did not mature until after final…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Texas Water Rights Commission v. Crow Iron WorksTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Manges v. Astra Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Godde v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- City of Dallas v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Greater Houston Bank v. ConteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weiman v. Addicks-Fairbanks Road Sand Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992