Commonwealth v. Cottle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
The issue in the present appeal is whether the sentencing judge in imposing the maximum prison sentence upon appellant for a violation of probation abused his discretion in view of the circumstances of this case.
On February 25, 1969, one Mike Matthew Holmes was sentenced by this writer.* Mr. Holmes had been convicted as a participant in a robbery of a SEPTA trolley. At that proceeding, though he was not a party to and had never been charged, the appellant, Ernest Cottle, approached the bench regarding his participation in the robbery.
Subsequent events were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. WronaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. KostkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. PersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. SierraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. RiggSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. FergusonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. SchutzuesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.