Legal Opinion

Dustin v. Beckstrand

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1982No. 13824Published

1Opinion of the Court

654 P.2d 368 (1982)

103 Idaho 780

Herbert W. DUSTIN, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Leonard BECKSTRAND and Mary Burdette Beckstrand, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants, and

Big Wood Canal Company, Defendant.

No. 13824.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

August 27, 1982.

Rehearing Denied December 9, 1982.

Dalon Esplin, Lowell N. Hawkes, Chartered, Pocatello, for defendants-appellants.

Jon J. Shindurling, May, May, Sudweeks, Shindurling & Stubbs, Twin Falls, for plaintiff-respondent.

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

The…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. R. E. W. Construction Co. v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lisher v. KrasseltIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Sherwood & Roberts, Inc. v. RiplingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API