Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Vaughan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2001No. 1999-2203Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 544.] IN RE ESTATE OF VAUGHAN. [Cite as In re Estate of Vaughan,

2001-Ohio-222.] Probate—Descent and distribution—Juvenile court admission of paternity pursuant to former R.C. 3111.17 is not the equivalent of acknowledgement of paternity required by former R.C. 2105.18 for vesting child born out of wedlock with rights of inheritance from natural father. (No. 99-2203—Submitted September 27, 2000—Decided January 17, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 75790. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Brookbank v. GrayOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kirshner v. ShinaberryOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. In Re Minor of MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. In re Estate of VaughanOhio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API