Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Gluck Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 11, 1931No. 13067PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabrer.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. The complaint alleges that on or about September 18, 1929, and for a short time .prior thereto, the plaintiff, an infant of seventeen years and practically without experience, was in the employ of the defendant as a “helper to a man who was overhauling * * * the combers” in its cardroom; that at the head of a comber, and a part of same are two pulleys, one known as the “tight” and the other as the “loose” pulley; that there extends from an overhead pulley, attached to a driving…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McKee v. TourtellotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Keistler Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Stephens v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  4. Barnhill v. Cherokee Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  5. Lyon v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boling v. Woodside Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API