Legal Opinion

State v. Gollas-Gomez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 2018No. A161005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAoyagi, J.

*286Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for five counts of sexual abuse. In his first assignment of error, he argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to strike a prospective juror, Juror 11, for cause. Because we agree with defendant, we reverse and remand for a new trial, and we do not reach his other assignments of error.

The relevant facts are procedural and undisputed. The state charged defendant with five counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, based on alleged incidents involving his two daughters, aged 11 and 12 years old. During…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lambert v. Sisters of St. Joseph of PeaceOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. FanusOregon Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dorn v. Three Rivers School Dist.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. VilledaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Hartt v. City of KeizerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. PughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. PughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API