Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Berryhill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 20, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-1420PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
The Acting Commissioner of Social Security determined that Plaintiff Reginald Mitchell is not disabled under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., and is therefore ineligible to receive Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Plaintiff then filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking either a reversal of that decision or a remand to the Social Security Administration for a new administrative hearing.
Defendant now moves for affirmance of the decision. As the Court agrees that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kevin Byes v. Michael J. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Rose E. Brown v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Florida Municipal Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunlap v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Higgins v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Jackson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Johnson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- McEachin v. KijakaziDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.